Names in the Bible: Did They Have Last Names?

Posted in

This piece was originally featured in the Southern Nebraska Registerโ€™s โ€œAsk the Registerโ€ column on March 22, 2024, which can be found here.

Q. How come we never hear the last names of the people in the Bible? Did they have last names?

A. The short answer is: No, the biblically attested figures did not have last names in the conventional sense. That is to say, they generally did not have hereditary or โ€œfamilyโ€ namesโ€”what we often call โ€˜surnamesโ€™โ€”following their first or โ€œgivenโ€ names.

The convention of surnames was brought to England by the Normans in the 11th century, and they were not first of all inherited, but coined, to differentiate (as one might expect) one person from another with the same given name, by appealing to certain aspects associated with that individual: oneโ€™s fatherโ€™s name, perhaps, or a distinguishing physical feature (John the Tall), or oneโ€™s trade (John the Tanner vs. John the Blacksmith), eventually dropping the article โ€˜the,โ€™ and occasionally morphing according to pronunciation. So, John Tull. John Tanner. John Smith.

This connects nicely to your question about the absence of last names in the Bible. While in the eras of the production of the books in our sacred canon, surnames were not yet in use, this is not to say that other words werenโ€™t called into service to help distinguish one person from another, just as the English began doing much later in the medieval era. โ€œSimon Bar-Jonah,โ€ Jesus calls Simon/Peter in Matthew 16:17, using the Aramaic word โ€˜barโ€™ (son) to clarify for future generations that it was this particular Simonโ€”the son of a man called โ€˜Jonahโ€™โ€”and not some other Simon that had made the confession that Jesus is Godโ€™s Messiah (and probably to emphasize as well that it was not Simonโ€™s earthly father who enlightened him to this truth, but his heavenly Father instead).

Other examples abound. There were lots of Marys, so they are distinguished by additional words that have become more or less conventionally part of their โ€œfullโ€ names: Mary Magdalene, Mary the wife of Clopas. Numerous Josephs, too, in the ancient world. So, Joseph of Arimathea. Even โ€˜Jesusโ€™ was a popular name! But there was one called Jesus of Nazareth who was set apart from the others.

Things are even more interesting in the Old Testament, where names are fabricated from whole phrases or sentences mashed into a single world used to describe someoneโ€™s life story or to draw attention to a special role a person plays. The name of the prophet โ€˜Elijahโ€™ means โ€˜my god is Yahwehโ€™ (the proper name for himself that God explains to Moses from the burning bush). The Hebrew name โ€˜Joshuaโ€™ means โ€˜Yahweh saves,โ€™ the Greek equivalent of which is โ€˜Jesusโ€™ (cf. Matt 1:21). Long before American Indians used language in this way (think โ€˜Dances with Wolvesโ€™ in the popular movie with that title), the heroes and heroines in the Bible (and some antiheroes as well!) had already standardized this practice.

One last point to ponder about names in the Bible. As an an Old Testament specialist, one of the good questions I often receive from students is what to do about all those genealogies; the long lists of names that no one can pronounce and that give lectors panic attacks when they discover itโ€™s their turn to read them in the Liturgy of the Word at Mass. Why were they included in Sacred Scripture? What good do they do?

Well, one helpful thing they do is to provide a resource for us to consult whenโ€”as we read through the various large and sweeping narratives in the OTโ€”we are introduced to someone whose name is strange, and whose back story we struggle to remember. Ah, letโ€™s check the genealogies to discover whose son or daughter this new character is, and where he or she comes from! And whether there are any additional details the genealogy includes that may help us to get hold of the authorโ€™s purpose in bringing up this person!

Thatโ€™s what good Bible reading seeks to do: to notice when details from one text call to mind details from another text, many pagesโ€”or even booksโ€”away, producing a deep and meaningful revelation about God and his ways with the world, which we wonโ€™t be in a position to understand unless we pay attention, even to the โ€œfly-overโ€ zones.


Comments

  1. A. Kendrick Avatar
    A. Kendrick

    Considering your answers to the question of last names in the bible, Are the last names to be considered God given, inspired by the Holy Spirit? Or are they mearly added just man made conventions to helf clarify whom is being referred to?


    1. Chad Steiner Avatar
      Chad Steiner

      Hi A. Kendrick,

      Iโ€™m not sure I understand your question, which presupposes that there are surnames, though the original question above asks why there are not, which I explain in my response. Perhaps you mean to refer to the additional words surrounding some namesโ€”e.g., Simon Bar-Jonah; Joseph of Arimathea. Here, it may be that the Holy Spirit influenced a family or culture to arrive at such a convention for reasons beyond mere differentiation. But whether this is the case, and what is the revelatory significance such additional words may be presenting are matters to be worked out in the exegesis of those biblical texts.

      In the grace of Christ,

      -Chad


  2. Geoff Avatar

    So how would you refer to Mary, Joseph and Jesus in full then? And why are they not named in full. Do all Christian faiths accept they Holy Family were sinless and with no blame as the Catholic Church does?


  3. Thomas Avatar

    A Kendrick and Geoff

    I would suggest going to Christianremedyinlaw.org for a more comprehensive understanding of First and Last names in the Bible.


    1. Chad Steiner Avatar
      Chad Steiner

      Thomas,

      Welcome to Emmaus. From a quick glance at the website you reference, I note three things:

      1) It seems to be a repository of video and audio resources, with no clear path I can see toward any specific development of the convention(s) of names and naming in the Bible;

      2) The construction and updating of the siteโ€”or at least of the resources called variously โ€˜meetingsโ€™, โ€˜eventsโ€™, โ€˜seminarsโ€™โ€”seem to have been suspended earlier this year;

      3) Its commitment to the King James Version of the Bibleโ€”an abridged version of the Scriptures missing seven books, as well as portions of other books from the official canon of the one Church Jesus establishedโ€”should be noted, and visitors of the site should be aware that other non-Catholic commitments may be present throughout the site which nonetheless styles itself โ€˜Christianโ€™ in its title.

      Re: 1), could you point us toward a specific article or vlog or audio resource on the site which addresses biblical names and naming, in case we wish to avail ourselves to, as you say, โ€˜a more comprehensive understandingโ€™?

      Re: 3) this is the wrong thread to pursue questions about the canon, but for those who would like a โ€˜more comprehensiveโ€™ development, this article is a good start, along with the extended discussion following it (in which I suggest paying special attention to the exchange between Shawn Madden and Joe Heschmeyer).

      In the grace of Christ,

      -Chad


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are subject to moderation in accordance with our posting guidelines. Follow these instructions to format your comment.